ArticleTrader.com
  

 Main Menu

  Home
  Member Login
  Forum
  Submit Article
  Membership
  RSS Feeds
  Contact Us
  About

 Services

  Article Distribution
  Link Building

 Tools

  ArticleMS
  Directory Tracker

 Categories

  Automotive
  Business
  » Advertising
  » Branding
  » Career
  » Communication
  » Customer Service
  » Management
  » Marketing
  » Networking
  » PR
  » Sales
  » Small Business
  Computers
  Entertainment
  Finance
  Food
  Health
  Home and Family
  Internet
  Legal
  Science
  Self Improvement
  Shopping
  Society
  Sports
  Technology
  Travel
  Writing

187 users online.



 
  » Category Sponsors
  Gifts for your family

Home » Business » What Does Secession Look Like

AureliaMasterson
Article written by AureliaMasterson

View Full Profile
Get Html Code
PDF | Print View | Post to your Site

What Does Secession Look Like

Submitted by AureliaMasterson
Tue, 25 May 2010

Executive Summary - We are going to show you the actual secession document from Missouri, dated 1861 (don't get excited yet). You can read it and then we will compare the points Missouri makes in the secession document to the federal government today.
Missouri's Ordinance of Secession

"AN ACT declaring the political ties heretofore existing between the State of Missouri and the United States of America dissolved.

WHEREAS, the Government of the United States, in the possession and under the control of a sectional party, has wantonly violated the compact originally made between said government and the State of Missouri, by invading with hostile armies the soil of the State, attacking and making prisoners the militia whilst legally assembled under the State laws, forcibly occupying the State capital, and attempting, through the instrumentality of domestic traitors, to usurp the State government, seizing and destroying private property, and murdering with fiendish malignity peaceable citizens, men, women, and children, together with other acts of atrocity, indicating a deep settled hostility toward the people of Missouri and their institutions; and,

WHEREAS, the present administration of the government of the United States has utterly ignored the Constitution, subverted the government as constructed and intended by its makers, and established a despotic and arbitrary power instead thereof; Now, therefore,

Be it enacted by the general assembly of the State of Missouri, as follows:

That all political ties of every character now existing between the government of the United States of America and the people and government of the State of Missouri, resuming the sovereignty granted by compact to the said United States upon admission of said State into the Federal Union, does again take its place as a free and independent republic amongst the nations of the earth.

This act to take effect and be in force from and after its passage.

Passed by the Senate, Oct 28, 1861

Passed by the House, Oct 30, 1861

Signed by Governor Claiborne Fox Jackson, Oct 31 1861.

First Contention - "wantonly violated the compact originally made between said government and the State of Missouri". This seems valid for today as well applicable to all the states that are supposed to be Republics.

Second Contention - " invading with hostile armies the soil of the State". They have done this with their federal law enforcement agencies in violation of posse comitatus and in new Orleans blackwater security forces. Martial law will be the culmination of this. Remember each state is a republic, the fed has no dominant powers over them according to the constitution.

Third Contention - "forcibly occupying the State capital". Not yet.

Fourth Contention - "attacking and making prisoners the militia whilst legally assembled under the State laws" The constitutions firmly allows for armed state militias. They have just started rounding up the militias on trumped up charges. Got the Hutaree and another group in Conneticut, so far.

Fifth Contention - "attempting, through the instrumentality of domestic traitors, to usurp the State government, seizing and destroying private property, and murdering with fiendish malignity peaceable citizens, men, women, and children, together with other acts of atrocity, indicating a deep settled hostility toward the people of Missouri and their institutions;". Does this sound like the court system at work with law enforcement and the prison system. 80% of people in prison are there for a crime where there is no flesh and blood victim testifying against the accused.

Citizens have no access to the grand juries to accuse the government of atrocities and unconstitutional behavior so we see ten year old children getting short in the head with tasers for no valid reason. The grand jury access is controlled by the prosecutors who are one of them, conflict of interest. How many people do you know that understand that all citizens are supposed to have access to the grand jury to bring charges against government and the rich and famous. I would guess 1 in 500,000 at best. See how they play the battlefield for the mind with faulty education in the schools.

Summary - The pieces of the puzzle are all there. The states are trying an end run with states rights taking the fed to their own federal courts. Come on who can think this is possibly going to be successful. After the states realize the federal courts are part of those that are suppressing them then the next step is secession which requires no federal court permission. The fed will probably have their courts rule this to be illegal and then the civl war two is on full out.

Taking a preemptive strike with full martial law eliminating any state governments is a move they may take to avoid this confrontation. The fed is to a large extent playing a head game with the people. They cannot afford to let things get to the point where the people are plainly convinced that they are legal and the fed is illegal. Then there is a cause to fight for. The well armed American people motivated and fighting for a cause they firmly believe in a serious threat to them. They have to make the people think they are behaving legally thus the supreme court rules against the states.

 

Aurelia Masterson writes for http://www.panamalaw.org


Source: ArticleTrader.com
Creative Commons License

Comments

No comments posted.

Add Comment

You do not have permission to comment. If you log in, you may be able to comment.

 Top Authors

 1 Stebee (3270)
 2 limalan88 (2920)
 3 alien82 (2756)
 4 kajuba (2508)
 5 sverdlow (1712)
 6 jamiehanson (1705)
 7 juliet (1691)
 8 MarkeD (1296)
 9 robertoms2003 (1295)
 10 AnthonyF (1244)
 11 articles (1205)
 12 artavia.seo (1148)
 13 spinxwebdesign (1119)
 14 gprather (1071)
 15 LouieLiu (1069)

 Distribution

Article Distribution

  
  Affiliate Program 2Checkout.com, Inc. is an authorized retailer of ArticleTrader.com

0.04s