ArticleTrader.com
  

 Main Menu

  Home
  Member Login
  Forum
  Submit Article
  Membership
  RSS Feeds
  Contact Us
  About

 Services

  Article Distribution
  Link Building

 Tools

  ArticleMS
  Directory Tracker

 Categories

  Automotive
  Business
  Computers
  Entertainment
  » Gambling
  » Humor
  » Movies
  » Music
  » Photography
  » Poetry
  Finance
  Food
  Health
  Home and Family
  Internet
  Legal
  Science
  Self Improvement
  Shopping
  Society
  Sports
  Technology
  Travel
  Writing

187 users online.



 
  » Category Sponsors
  The Best In Entertainment

Home » Entertainment » New Scientist Recommends Martindale Roulette System

Stebee
Article written by Stebee

View Full Profile
Get Html Code
PDF | Print View | Post to your Site

New Scientist Recommends Martindale Roulette System

Submitted by David Salt
Wed, 7 Oct 2009

Make Money With Your Site!
Sell Links off your
site at ReverseLinks.
Buy Permenant Links
Get Permanent Text Links
for cheap.
New Scientist has recently investigated the use of mathematics in gambling strategies and somewhat surprisingly has recommended the use of Martingale betting systems in roulette.

Although the journal is not peer reviewed and as such does not qualify as a scientific journal in the sense that it publishes original research, it does have a very high reputation amongst scientists and non-scientists alike. Recently the magazine has met with some criticism regarding its recent trend to over-hype some scientific issues with the aim of increasing its appeal to non-technical readers. In the latest issue it has looked at the relationship between gambling and mathematics and has reached some startling, and totally incorrect, conclusions.

The article in question was written by Helen Tomson, who happens to be the magazine's careers editor. She was assisted by Edward Thorpe, the famous gambler and author of ‘Beat the Dealer' which described the subtle art of card counting at Blackjack. The author correctly points out that in the game of roulette the outcome of each spin of the wheel is a random event and that there is an equal chance of red coming up as black even if the last twenty spins have been black. But she then goes on to tell her readers that probability theory can be used to ensure that a profit is made.

What she advocates is the Martindale system, which is a progressive gambling system that has resulted in the ruin of many who have placed their faith in it. In her version of the system she advocates always betting on the same colour and, if it loses, doubling the bet next time. She points out that eventually you are bound to win.

Although she uses an example where seven successive losses means placing a stake of £1280 on the next spin, and suggests that caution is needed, she fails to show that on her first example of twenty spins the next stake would be a staggering £10,485,760 in order to win back the original £10, clearly an absurdity.

New Scientist should know better. Roulette is an entertaining game that we can sometimes win if we are lucky. Advocating Martindale as an example of where mathematics can provide a winning strategy is very misleading.

--

 

If you enjoy playing online roulette then you need to visit www.onlineroulette.co.uk and claim your bonus of anything from £100 upto £1000 - so start winning real cash now.


Source: ArticleTrader.com
Creative Commons License

Comments

No comments posted.

Add Comment

You do not have permission to comment. If you log in, you may be able to comment.

 Top Authors

 1 Stebee (3270)
 2 limalan88 (2920)
 3 alien82 (2756)
 4 kajuba (2508)
 5 sverdlow (1712)
 6 juliet (1691)
 7 jamiehanson (1690)
 8 MarkeD (1296)
 9 AnthonyF (1244)
 10 robertoms2003 (1208)
 11 articles (1205)
 12 artavia.seo (1148)
 13 spinxwebdesign (1112)
 14 gprather (1071)
 15 cj (1069)

 Distribution

Article Distribution

  
  Affiliate Program 2Checkout.com, Inc. is an authorized retailer of ArticleTrader.com

0.02s