A Reaction to Microsoft’s New Employee Monitoring System

Job stress is a major concern for many organisations. Over the last 25 years, research has shown an immense growth in stress-related illness across British business. Stress-related absence alone is estimated to cost the UK economy of is in excess of £5bn per year, while a recent report by the European Heart Journal claims that people under 50 who reported high levels of job-related stress were 70% more likely to develop heart disease than those in an unstressed job.

So, what can employers do about this problem? Microsoft has recently filed a patent for a computer system that actively seeks to monitor performance and well-being by measuring physiological factors such as heart rate, body temperature, movement, facial expressions and blood pressure. The system, Microsoft claims, could “automatically detect frustration or stress in the user” and notify management of a potential problem.

In principle, this appears to be a good idea. Of course, there have been the usual cries of a ‘surveillance society’ and Orwell’s Big Brother’, but it is well recognised that stress reduces employee well-being and can manifest itself in physical symptoms that adversely affect an individual’s ability to perform. This system, if properly implemented, could be a valuable addition to an organisation’s ‘stress management toolkit’.

However, it is important to take a holistic and proactive view of the situation – monitoring physiological signs of stress is only one of many approaches to stress management. Organisations should have systems in place that address the key stages in the stress journey:

a) Prevention: Studies have shown that nearly a quarter of variance in job performance can be attributed to how happy and positive your employees feel. Applying the principles of positive psychology – i.e. focusing on promoting mental ‘wellness’ as opposed to addressing mental ‘illness’ – allows for a pre-emptive strike on the causes of unhappiness and stress before they can manifest themselves.

b) Detection: Used alongside engagement surveys and employee well-being audits, Microsoft’s new system could be a positive addition to an organisation’s ability to identify job stressors and stress reactions. If identified early enough, the organisation could implement global or local changes to remove the factors that cause stress before they get too serious.

c) Treatment and Rehabilitation: What is one person’s healthy pressure can be another person’s source of burn-out. It is inevitable that, even with the implementation of preventative action, some individuals will slip through the net and demonstrate signs of chronic stress. Interventions at an organisational level (e.g. improving job content, adjusting environmental factors, enhancing person-job fit) and at an individual level (e.g. implementing employee assistance programmes, teaching coping and relaxation strategies) can help employees to overcome stress both now and in the future.

The fact is employee well-being is critical to the success of a business. Without it, the organisation risks losing the very thing that makes it great – its people. Microsoft’s new system does indeed raise serious questions over privacy. However, with careful and considerate implementation, this system could be a valuable addition to an organisation’s holistic approach to stress management.

Mike Idziaszczyk
Psychologist
Pearn Kandola

Mike Idziaszczyk