ArticleTrader.com
  

 Main Menu

  Home
  Member Login
  Forum
  Submit Article
  Membership
  RSS Feeds
  Contact Us
  About

 Services

  Article Distribution
  Link Building

 Tools

  ArticleMS
  Directory Tracker

 Categories

  Automotive
  Business
  Computers
  Entertainment
  Finance
  Food
  Health
  Home and Family
  Internet
  » Affiliate Programs
  » Blogging
  » Domains
  » Email
  » Forums
  » Online Business
  » PPC Advertising
  » RSS
  » Security
  » SEO
  » Site Promotion
  » Spam
  » Web Design
  » Web Hosting
  Legal
  Science
  Self Improvement
  Shopping
  Society
  Sports
  Technology
  Travel
  Writing

187 users online.



 
  » Category Sponsors
  Cheap SEO Service

Home » Internet » Seo » Is Google Stopping Counting Directory Links?

jackmack
Article written by jackmack

View Full Profile
Get Html Code
PDF | Print View | Post to your Site

Is Google Stopping Counting Directory Links?

Submitted by jackmack
Mon, 3 Nov 2008

Make Money With Your Site!
Sell Links off your
site at ReverseLinks.
Buy Permenant Links
Get Permanent Text Links
for cheap.
You may or may not have heard that Google has removed the recommendation in its webmasters guidelines section to submit to directories. This started a panic as people though that having links in directories no longer held any weight. They thought this would have a nock on effect on there SEO results. In this article I discuss why people think this is an issue and reveal why Google really removed the recommendation.
Lets begin by talking about what directories do and how they affect your rankings. What directories do is allow you submit your website so visitors to the directory can find resources. Your listing has a link to your website and this is why it can affect your rankings. This will increase your link count and therefore increase your websites strength, in theory anyway.
So if Google was to devaluate these links then surely lots of people’s websites will drop in rankings.
So why did Google remove this recommendation from the webmasters guidelines? One of the reasons it was thought that they had removed this advice was that Google themselves were going to create a directory of their own that wasn’t based on DMOZ but this has turned out not to be true. So getting back to the original question, why did Google remove it? Matt Cutts the long standing Google spokesperson who I am a regular reader of his blog answered this very question. Matt says there is always the chance that Google may devaluate these links but the reason they removed it was because they where seeing quite a lot of novice people seeing this recommendation and submitting their website to many poor quality directories.
If you are looking for an SEO companies that can help your ecommerce web design rank better I would go here. They helped me and I learned a lot from them.
My two cent worth: I think you are safe at the moment but as I have said before you should not put all your eggs in one basket and use only one way to build links make sure your website is of good quality and try different linking techniques. I do believe that Google will devaluate these kinds of links in the future based on the strength of the directory so if you just submit to quality directories you should be save. However like I say don’t just use directories as some are of poor quality. One good one I found is the MOO Directory check it out its free.

--

 

Author

Jack Mack

Jack's Website: Poker Rules


Source: ArticleTrader.com
Creative Commons License

Comments

No comments posted.

Add Comment

You do not have permission to comment. If you log in, you may be able to comment.

 Top Authors

 1 Stebee (3270)
 2 limalan88 (2920)
 3 alien82 (2756)
 4 kajuba (2508)
 5 sverdlow (1712)
 6 juliet (1691)
 7 jamiehanson (1690)
 8 MarkeD (1296)
 9 AnthonyF (1244)
 10 robertoms2003 (1208)
 11 articles (1205)
 12 artavia.seo (1148)
 13 spinxwebdesign (1112)
 14 gprather (1071)
 15 cj (1069)

 Distribution

Article Distribution

  
  Affiliate Program 2Checkout.com, Inc. is an authorized retailer of ArticleTrader.com

0.03s