<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Latest Articles by dfletcher312</title>
<link>http://www.articletrader.com/</link>
<description>Articles at ArticleTrader</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>Brits Are Taking More Cash On Holiday To Avoid Credit Card Charges </title>
<link>http://www.articletrader.com/finance/credit/brits-are-taking-more-cash-on-holiday-to-avoid-credit-card-charges.html</link>
<guid>http://www.articletrader.com/finance/credit/brits-are-taking-more-cash-on-holiday-to-avoid-credit-card-charges.html</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[ Credit cards have become a prominent part of modern day life with British consumers using them to pay from everything from the household bills to purchasing a new car. More people have also started to use them abroad on their holidays as a convenient way to pay for goods and services or as a means of withdrawing cash. <br /><br />However using a credit card in this way does have some drawbacks, which some people have found out about the hard way. According to Nationwide Building Society, Brits abroad were charged over £650 million pounds in fees for foreign currency usage during 2007. Every time people were using their credit cards abroad they were being charged around 2.75% on top of their purchases. Even worse was the charge for withdrawing cash a broad which topped around three percent. In addition to this there may have been added a withdrawal charge making the total amount very expensive indeed. <br /><br />However this year it seems that holiday makers have learnt their lesson and are more inclined to take out cash before travel to take with them rather than withdrawing cash abroad. Recent statistics estimate that this year the credit card will be shunned and more than one billion pounds extra will be taken abroad to avoid credit card fees. On average British holiday makers are taking around two hundred pounds more in cash with them on their travels than they did in 2007. <br /><br />Another reason for taking cash rather than the cards is it can help people to stay within their budget. When you are on holiday the temptation to overspend can be high. It can be easy to think that you are getting a bargain on all your purchases because the transactions are being completed in a foreign currency. Research by Travelex.co.uk found that people had been prone to overspending on their credit cards in recent years and wanted to ensure they stayed within their budgets this year, so were taking more cash with them. Other people said that they wanted to reduce the amount they were spending on credit card fees and therefore decided to take cash to avoid them as much as possible. For Travelex this is good news as more people are changing currency before they fly which means more business for them. <br /><br />However there are some alternatives to credit cards if people do not want to take more cash. Taking large amounts of cash can become more problematic if you become a victim of theft whilst on holiday. If cards get stolen then can be cancelled easy enough, but once cash has gone it is very difficult to get it back. In order to bridge the gap Abbey bank introduced a new Zero card which does not incur any foreign exchange fees or fees for withdrawing money as a cash advance. Debit cards can also be a viable alternative with some cards also not charging for cash withdrawals. A third alternative is to purchase a prepaid card but be warned there are often fees attached to this; however they may be lower that the fees your credit card provider is charging. <br /><br /><br />--<br />Danielle is an author of several articles pertaining to <a href="http://www.onlyfinance.com/Credit-Cards/" title="Credit Cards">Credit Cards</a>. He is known for his expertise on the subject and on other Business and Finance related articles. <br /><br><br>Source: <a href="http://www.articletrader.com/">http://www.articletrader.com</a> ]]></description>
</item><item>
<title>Loans Lead Companies Branching Out  </title>
<link>http://www.articletrader.com/finance/loans/loans-lead-companies-branching-out.html</link>
<guid>http://www.articletrader.com/finance/loans/loans-lead-companies-branching-out.html</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[ For banks and other financial institutions finding enough people who want to use their loan products has not typically been a problem in the past. However due to recent events within the global financial markets, lenders have tighten up their lending criteria across a range of their products to ensure they are not going to lose money by lending to high risk individuals. <br /><br />With this is place, finding people who meet the criteria can be a bit more of a challenge. Lenders don’t want to stop loaning people money as this is the base of their business. If they do stop lending money their profits will decrease and they will find themselves struggling to make the profits they have experienced in recent years. These is where loan lead companies can come to the rescue and provide a much needed search facility to find the right customers for the banks to lend their money too. <br /><br />Typically lead generation companies have focused on secured loan leads. Lenders are happier to lend in this way as it means that they get something back if the customer defaults on the loan. Often a secured loan would be secured across an individual’s property although sometimes lenders will loan money against other items of value such as a car. Unsecured loans are not secured against anything and therefore lenders run the risk of losing the money if the borrower defaults on payments. However due to the success of secured loans lenders are now considering the unsecured loan market. <br /><br />One lead generation company has found that the unsecured loan market is in need of helping hand. The Company paaleads.com has been working with another company and together the match people looking to borrow with private investors looking to lend. Unlike banks, private investors do not typically lend out huge amounts of money to thousands of people purely because they are unable to raise that volume of capital. So private investors are looking for borrowers who are lower risk and represent more of a secure deal as the number they are lending to is less. Therefore strict lending criteria means that some borrowers will not be suitable for this type of arrangement and paaleads.com is now seeking to find lenders who are more willing to lend under these circumstances. Their venture in the secured loan market has opened avenues in the unsecured loan market with advisors now approaching them for leads in this sector. <br /><br />Opening up the unsecured loan market and making it easier for both borrows and lenders alike to find a good deal is beneficial to the financial markets as a whole. In times of economic down turn people do still need credit and when their normal source for this starts tightening their lending criteria, they may be forced to start looking elsewhere. A company that works to provide unsecured loan leads to market is going to be able to carve out a niche. Whilst secured loans typically are more the loan type of choice for lenders, unsecured loans are still a viable way of making money, and while this is the case there will be a market for unsecured loan leads. <br /><br /><br />--<br />Danielle is an author of several articles pertaining to <a href="http://www.onlyfinance.com/Loans/Secured-Loans.aspx" title="Secured Loans">Secured Loans</a>. He is known for his expertise on the subject and on other Business and Finance related articles. <br /><br><br>Source: <a href="http://www.articletrader.com/">http://www.articletrader.com</a> ]]></description>
</item><item>
<title>More People Choosing To Rent </title>
<link>http://www.articletrader.com/finance/mortgage/more-people-choosing-to-rent.html</link>
<guid>http://www.articletrader.com/finance/mortgage/more-people-choosing-to-rent.html</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[ Recent figures show the number of houses sold in the UK in the last five months has fallen by 32 percent compared to the same time last year. Figures by the HM Revenue and Customs which record the houses purchases of properties worth more than the initial forty thousand pound tax band, show that the number of properties sold between January and May 2008 was only 504,000 which is down from 743,000 last year. <br /><br />It is now estimated that there are far more sellers than there are buyers in the market leading to speculation that the house market is still going to get worse before it gets better. <br /><br />Some industry experts say that the mortgage industry has to take some responsibility for the state of the housing market. It was the mortgage industry which lent money to those people considered high risk and who only last year offered a huge range of products designed to tempt practically anyone into buying a property. Today the market is completely different with the number of mortgage products available down by 25 thousand from August last year. The reduction in mortgage choice is tremendous, and many people who were previously able to find a mortgage deal are no longer able to. For those who have brought this is bad news. It has resulted in less people coming into the market place and therefore the opportunity to sell has been decreased. People who are struggling to afford their mortgage have very few options about what to do next. In the past if your mortgage became unaffordable you had the option of selling to ease the pain, now that option is diminishing as buyers dry up. <br /><br />However for one group of mortgage holder, things don’t look that bad. People who have brought buy to let properties are feeling confident that there will be an increase in demand in the number of people wanting to rent. Research by Paragon Mortgages found that more than half of landlords were predicting an increase in the number of people wanting to rent over the next year. This is good reason to feel this way as the number of first time buyers getting onto the market has decreased due to the stricter mortgage lending criteria. People are suddenly more wary of the housing market. After years of boom and increasing profits from property, the current down turn is putting people off from getting on or moving up the property ladder, meaning more people want to rent. In addition there has been an increase in foreign students looking to come to the UK to study which is adding to the rental markets buoyancy. <br /><br />However landlords are still subject to the same interest rate increases on their mortgages as everyone else, which could mean that there is an increase in the price of rents as demand increases. This may eventually lead more people to consider buying, but that is most likely to happen if interest rates go down and confidence in the UK property market goes up. <br /><br /><br />--<br />Danielle is an author of several articles pertaining to <a href="http://www.onlyfinance.com/Mortgages/" title="Mortgages">Mortgages</a>. He is known for his expertise on the subject and on other Business and Finance related articles. <br /><br><br>Source: <a href="http://www.articletrader.com/">http://www.articletrader.com</a> ]]></description>
</item><item>
<title>Moving House In The UK Is An Expensive Business </title>
<link>http://www.articletrader.com/finance/mortgage/moving-house-in-the-uk-is-an-expensive-business.html</link>
<guid>http://www.articletrader.com/finance/mortgage/moving-house-in-the-uk-is-an-expensive-business.html</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[ The whole process of buying and selling houses can be very expensive and is additional stretch on people’s finances. Two of the biggest costs are conveyancing and tax which can add thousands of pounds on both the buyers and sellers bills. <br /><br />Recent figures show that the average cost of a conveyancing service for someone purchasing a property is now over one thousand pounds, whereas the costs for a seller is around five hundred pounds. If you add these costs up with stamp duty, and mortgage fees buyers especially are going to find the bills can get very expensive. In addition these figures can be made worse if a sale does not actually go through. Many people start the conveyancing process for buyers and sellers to back down at the last minute and change their minds. Often there are no refunds policies for fees on properties which fail to complete leaving many people out of pocket. It is estimated that the UK population spend around £98 million pounds every year on property sales that fail to actually complete. <br /><br />Avoiding this situation can be difficult as it is hard to second guess whether or not the buyer or seller is completely committed to the deal. However there are a few things that can be done to protect your finances against an uncompleted sale. One such thing is to negotiate a fixed fee with the solicitors for the conveyancing work. This means that you know the costs up front and they are unlikely to spiral out of control, which could happen if you are paying by the hour. Some solicitors firms do advertise a flat rate for carrying out conveyancing work, which can be an attractive alternative, but you do need to remember that the fee does not include additional charges such as the fee to transfer money from your bank to your lender. <br /><br />Trying to reduce the costs of moving house can be tricky but there are some ways that it can done. Typically it has always been the buyers that stump up the majority of the moving costs, but that changed last year with the introduction of the Home Information Packs. This pack carries out some of the searches that previously buyers had to pay for when purchasing a property. However not all mortgage lenders will accept the results of these searches and will demand that they own searches are carried. There is little that can be done in this situation so buyers should make sure if they know whether this will be the case or not before they commit to that lender. <br /><br />Using an online conveyancing is another way which could save both buyers and sellers money. Online conveyancing works by handling the case through email and post, which costs down on expensive face to face time.  However you need to make sure that the lawyers are insured in case anything goes wrong, otherwise you could find yourself having to fork out for the service for a second time somewhere else. In addition you could try completing some of the conveyancing work yourself in order to bring the costs down. You can purchase the forms from a number of sources, but again you need to be careful of getting it right because you will be liable for any mistakes. <br /><br />Using some of the methods listed above will help reduce conveyancing costs but whilst we continue to have the same legal system, costs for moving house in the UK will always be high.  <br /><br /><br />--<br />Danielle is an author of several articles pertaining to <a href="http://www.onlyfinance.com/Mortgages/" title="Mortgages">Mortgages</a>. He is known for his expertise on the subject and on other Business and Finance related articles. <br /><br><br>Source: <a href="http://www.articletrader.com/">http://www.articletrader.com</a> ]]></description>
</item><item>
<title>Police Force Face Claims For Race Discrimination  </title>
<link>http://www.articletrader.com/legal/personal-injury/police-force-face-claims-for-race-discrimination.html</link>
<guid>http://www.articletrader.com/legal/personal-injury/police-force-face-claims-for-race-discrimination.html</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[ Over recent months the British Police Force has found itself dealing with a number of claims for compensation due to discrimination in the workplace on grounds of race and ethnicity. One Police officer has submitted a claim for £500,000 pounds because he believes he was discriminated against and denied a promotion unfairly. <br /><br />The claim is being made against the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Ian Blair, who has been accused of sidelining, Asian and black detectives. There is no limit on the amount of compensation which can be in claimed in a race discrimination case which typically results in demands for high payouts. However there does need to be compelling evidence that the discrimination has occurred in order for a case to be successful.<br /><br />Unfortunately this Officer’s claim for compensation is not the only one to have been raised.  Another Police employee has also submitted a claim for racial discrimination at the hands of Sir Ian Blair. The claims have come as a bit of a shock, as many people believe that the Metropolitan police Commissioner got the job because of his stance on promoting diversity not for being against it. Sir Ian Blair strongly denies the claims and many others are supporting him.  However everybody who feels they have been the victim of racist in the workplace has the right to have their case heard. It may be that that the racism was not intentional but that does not matter in the eyes of the law. If someone, and not necessarily the alleged victim, feels that racism has occurred a case can be brought to a tribunal to ascertain the facts. <br /><br />Racism in the workplace occurs across all sectors and industries and poses very difficult situations for both employees and employers. Tribunals are the place where the cases get settled, but cases for race discrimination can take months to reach this point. Before a case goes to tribunal there has to be evidence that the situation has been tried to be resolved within the company first. Employees need to show they have exhausted the internal company policies which are typically done through raising a grievance or going through an appeal process. If the employee is not happy with the outcome and they have reached the end of the line in regards to company policies, then they are able to take their case to the tribunal. Employment law works differently to criminal law by the nature in which the verdict is determined. In a criminal court the evidence provided has to prove beyond reasonable doubt that a crime has or has not been committed. In employment law the evidence is weighed up according to the balance of probabilities. If there is a 51 percent chance that an event occurred than the ruling will come down in favour of that event.  Claims for race discrimination are treated in this manner and it will be up to both the employee and the employer to prove what happened before outcomes of the case can be decided. <br /><br /><br />--<br />Danielle is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, <a href="http://www.accidentsdirect.com/compensation-claims.aspx" title="Compensation Claims">Compensation Claims</a>, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.<br /><br><br>Source: <a href="http://www.articletrader.com/">http://www.articletrader.com</a> ]]></description>
</item><item>
<title>A Little Piece Of Good News For The Gloomy Property Market </title>
<link>http://www.articletrader.com/finance/mortgage/a-little-piece-of-good-news-for-the-gloomy-property-market.html</link>
<guid>http://www.articletrader.com/finance/mortgage/a-little-piece-of-good-news-for-the-gloomy-property-market.html</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[ The housing market in Britain is on a decline with more and more people being forced to sell due to rises in mortgage interest rates, and less buyers willing to invest in housing.  More first time buyers are staying away from the housing market altogether as lenders become stricter their lending criteria and harsher with their interest rates. <br /><br />For those who need to re-mortgage the market is moving very fast. It was only last week that one of the larger bigger banks was offering one of the best rates on the market, just seven days later this rate had jumped up by half a percent. Recently it has increased by additional 0.20 percent. The bad news is that this is not the only bank to raise its interest rates in quick succession with all of the big four lenders pushing up their interest rates particularly on shorter term fixed rate deals. Now the average two year fixed rate deal is more than seven percent, leaving home owners facing a more expensive mortgage bill. <br /><br />Mortgage problems have been compounded by falling house prices which have seen homes in some part of London fall by more than £25 thousand pounds in a month. These trends are not encouraging first time buyers who are already struggling to raise the high deposits needed and find an affordable mortgage. The number of first time buyers has decreased from 532 thousand in 2002 to 300,000 in 2007 and this year they are predicted to fall even lower. With so much doom and gloom surrounding the property market at the moment, buyers and sellers alike are waiting for some good news. And it seems that that good news may be on its way! An expert in the field has made predictions that this month could be the last month that mortgage rates rise and the effects of the credit crunch may start to ease. He is basing his predictions on the fact that margins for mortgage lenders were starting to make them good money again and therefore it made sense for banks to lower their interest rates in order to secure more people’s business <br /><br />It may be time when banks realise that if they start to lend out more money at lower rates they will be able to find more good customers willing to take them. However the housing and mortgage problem in the UK is a bit of a vicious circle. The housing market needs first time buyers to keep properties moving and allowing people to move up the ladder. At the moment first time buyers are struggling to get mortgages as lenders are worried about loaning people money against a depreciating asset. Therefore only first time buyers with large deposits are being offered deals, as their deposits act as buffer against falling house prices. But as long as first time buyers are unable to access the property market, housing will continue to fall in price leaving those who have brought homes with little room for manoeuvre. Hopefully predictions of better mortgage rates will come true allowing more people to survive the property crash, however it would seem the UK is still a long way off enjoying the benefits of the previous housing boom. <br /><br /><br />--<br />Danielle is an author of several articles pertaining to <a href="http://www.onlyfinance.com/Mortgages/" title="Mortgages">Mortgages</a>. He is known for his expertise on the subject and on other Business and Finance related articles. <br /><br><br>Source: <a href="http://www.articletrader.com/">http://www.articletrader.com</a> ]]></description>
</item><item>
<title>First Time Buyers Are Struggling To Find Mortgages </title>
<link>http://www.articletrader.com/finance/mortgage/first-time-buyers-are-struggling-to-find-mortgages.html</link>
<guid>http://www.articletrader.com/finance/mortgage/first-time-buyers-are-struggling-to-find-mortgages.html</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[ You may be forgiven for thinking that in today’s current economic situation finding a mortgage if you are a first time buyer is near on impossible. You would be right to a certain extent, in that mortgages for first time buyers are definitely harder to come by, but they are not completely extinct. The housing market relies on first time buyers to keep it buoyant and enable people to move to the next rung of the ladder. <br /><br />If there is a huge drop in the number of first time buyers, as we are currently experiencing, the market becomes stagnant and prices are forced to drop. For lenders this is not good news. Banks and other financial intuitions which have lent money to people so they can buy property want that investment to stay sound. If house prices are going up then profits are going to be made, which reduces the risk to the lender it case of the borrower not being able to meet the monthly payments.  So mortgage lenders are still offering products to help people onto the market, but admittedly the criteria to get one is now a lot more stringent. <br /><br />Banks are now requiring large deposits from first time buyers and evidence of a good credit history. Typically these two things can be difficult for first time buyers to produce. Firstly first time buyers are struggling to save with the increasing costs of living and secondly if they have been previously living with their parents or family, they may not amassed a sufficient credit rating themselves. Both of those facts may hinder their ability to find a good mortgage deal.  Typically first time buyers would have turned to the high street to find their mortgage deals. The big banks would often be advertising their rates in their windows aiming at enticing people in. Nowadays the advertisements seem to be more aimed at those who want to save money as opposed to those who want to spend it. <br /><br />The difficulty now is how do first time buyers find a mortgage lender that is prepared to offer them a deal. One way is through a mortgage lead company. Mortgage lead companies provide details of interested consumers for a range of financial products to financial institutions. Sometimes these financial institutions are smaller providers that are offering good deals but because of their size they do have the huge advertising budgets of the bigger banks and therefore struggle to let people know about what they are offering. By setting up websites where first time buyers can express an interest in certain products, mortgage lead companies can link up the borrowers with the lenders hopefully with some success.  This process can work well in matching first time buyers with people that are willing to lend them money which in turn will get them into the housing market. This may then help the chains that depend on first time buyers to move the market forward and hopefully reverse the fortunes of the current property ladder. <br /><br />--<br />Danielle is an author of several articles pertaining to <a href="http://www.onlyfinance.com/Mortgages/" title="Mortgages">Mortgages</a>. He is known for his expertise on the subject and on other Business and Finance related articles. <br /><br><br>Source: <a href="http://www.articletrader.com/">http://www.articletrader.com</a> ]]></description>
</item><item>
<title>Asbestos Victims Are Dying Before They Can Receive Their Compensation </title>
<link>http://www.articletrader.com/legal/personal-injury/asbestos-victims-are-dying-before-they-can-receive-their-compensation.html</link>
<guid>http://www.articletrader.com/legal/personal-injury/asbestos-victims-are-dying-before-they-can-receive-their-compensation.html</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[ People living in Australia, suffering from mesothelioma, a disease caused by asbestos poisoning are passing away before their claims for compensation are being heard. One Sydney Judge believes this is due to a cost saving measure which was implemented in 2005. <br /><br />The judge has spoken out and urged the New South Wales government to make rapid changes to the way the cases are handled in order to prevent further anguish to those victims who are already sick. If changes are not made to the rules more people will either become too sick to be able to give full evidence or they will die. <br /><br />The new system was introduced because of the huge legal costs which were amounting due to handling the number of asbestos related cases. In addition the funds for compensation were around $1.5 billion dollars less than what was needed. In order to cut down legal fees and reduce costs the government introduced a claims timetable and made mediation the way in which the claims were to be handled and solved. A review of how well this new system was working showed that legal costs had been reduced for both the defendant and the plaintiff which was considered to be positive. However the system failed by the amount of time it took to actually solve the cases, meaning that some victims never saw the money that they were entitled to and which could have enriched they lives during the final period. <br /><br />Now cases can be referred to a judge if it looks like the victim is likely to pass away before the case is resolved according to the timetable.  However this process is also not working quickly enough with some victims applying under this scheme dying only a couple of weeks before they are removed from the timetabled process. The judge, in speaking out against this process said that there is a serious problem if victims are only reviewed within the final few weeks of their lives. In these cases the victim is often in extremely poor health and deteriorating fast, making it very unlikely that their case will be solved within their life time. There have been calls to review the process to see if there is any way in which it can be sped up to avoid these types of situations. Many have also commented that the previous system used before the new timetabled version was put into place was more effective at solving the cases quickly. However due to the high legal costs to the defendant through the old system, it may not be financially viable to return to it. <br /><br />Overall the message is clear. Victims in these cases need to have their claims for compensation resolved before they die. It is important that this happens to ensure not only the financial well being of the victims in the last stages of their life but also the financial position of their families. <br /><br /><br />--<br />Danielle is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, <a href="http://www.accidentsdirect.com/compensation-claims.aspx" title="Compensation Claims">Compensation Claims</a>, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.<br /><br><br>Source: <a href="http://www.articletrader.com/">http://www.articletrader.com</a> ]]></description>
</item><item>
<title>Cap On Compensation For Whiplash Injuries To Be Reviewed </title>
<link>http://www.articletrader.com/legal/personal-injury/cap-on-compensation-for-whiplash-injuries-to-be-reviewed.html</link>
<guid>http://www.articletrader.com/legal/personal-injury/cap-on-compensation-for-whiplash-injuries-to-be-reviewed.html</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[ Car insurers in Canada are predicting a steep hike in insurance premiums if a current cap on compensation payments is removed. The average increase in rates is estimated at around eleven percent, which is a huge increase and way above the rate of inflation. <br /><br />This percentage increase will translate to between $60 and $75 Canadian dollars per policy, adding another strain to individual’s finances. Currently a report is being prepared ahead of the debate which will determine whether limits on compensation should be lifted or remain in place. <br /><br />Currently the reduction in insurance premiums in Canada over the last couple of years has been due to the Minor Injury Regulation. This was put in place to regulate the insurance market in regards to compensation pay out for smaller injuries such as whiplash and other soft tissue injuries. A cap was introduced on these types of injuries which has saved the insurance companies a considerable amount of money. However in February, this cap was ‘struck down’ by a Court of Queen’s Bench ruling and is due to be heard in the Alberta court of Appeal in September. If the cap removed insurance costs will undoubtedly go up, for whiplash injuries and the there will be no limit to the amount of compensation which can be awarded.<br /><br />Many people including lawyers and consumer groups are in favour of the cap being removed. Putting a price on an injury can be a difficult thing to do. Injuries such as whiplash can manifest themselves in different ways and sometimes the severity of the injury is not completely known until sometimes after the event. In addition soft tissue injuries and whiplash can result in varying amounts of pain and suffering dependant on how the injury was sustained. If is not necessarily true that those injuries in low speed car accidents will come off than better than those caught up in high speed car pile ups. Imposing a limit on the amount of compensation to be awarded may be detrimental to those people whose injuries will result in long-lasting effects. <br /><br />At the moment everybody is waiting for the outcome of the appeal. Those people who have claims for compensation already in the pipeline do not want to complete them until the ruling has been made, in case they miss out on the opportunity to increase their compensation One reason that the cap is under debate is that it could be considered to undermine the right of individuals to receive fair compensation for their injuries. Going forward consumers want to be sure that they can secure the money they need in order to survive after an accident. On the other side, those for the cap argue that the costs could spiral out of control which may destabilise the insurance industry unless huge hikes in premiums are introduced. The insurance industry are working hard to strengthen their case against the cap being removed but only time will tell whether or not they are going to be successful. <br /><br /><br />--<br />Danielle is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, <a href="http://www.accidentsdirect.com/compensation-claims.aspx" title="Compensation Claims">Compensation Claims</a>, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.<br /><br><br>Source: <a href="http://www.articletrader.com/">http://www.articletrader.com</a> ]]></description>
</item><item>
<title>Legal Firms Struggling To Find Conveyancing Work </title>
<link>http://www.articletrader.com/finance/mortgage/legal-firms-struggling-to-find-conveyancing-work.html</link>
<guid>http://www.articletrader.com/finance/mortgage/legal-firms-struggling-to-find-conveyancing-work.html</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[ Legal firms who specialise in offering a conveyancing service are beginning to struggle to make the profits they were once used to. The downturn in the housing market has meant there are far less buyers and therefore fewer houses are actually selling. <br /><br />Lawyers used to the property boom years are now starting to find it hard to survive, and many have to make stuff cut backs in order to save money. In addition the job market for newly qualified solicitors who wish to go into conveyancing is practically non-existent in some parts of the country. What is making the situation worse is that conveyancing has always been a large part of the legal industry in the UK and therefore a lot of time and effort has been spent building up practices and legal firms to cater for this need. Within the last year this seems to have changed completely due the drastic down turn in the number of people actually buying and selling property. <br /><br />But it is not just the legal firms that are struggling in today’s market. Recruitment firms specialising in legal markets have felt the knock on effects of less conveyancing work. One firm said that just last year half of the job vacancies that they were advertising were conveyancing related, now they say that that figure has dropped to zero. In addition there has been an increase in the number of the solicitors looking for work, especially those who are newly qualified. Legal firms just don’t seem to have the volume of work that they used and therefore are not taking on any new staff as well as reducing the number of existing ones. Legal firms across the whole of the property market are feeling the crunch with the property downturn now spreading into the commercial arena as well as the private sector. This will only mean harder times ahead if the market’s fortunes do not start improving soon. <br /><br />However even if the property market did start to make a turn round soon, it is still unlikely that the legal firms will be able to make a speedy recovery. Conveyancing firms have also been hit by bad press due to a number of unscrupulous lawyers with very dubious legal practices. One such tale concerns a number of banks who lost millions of Euros, after two solicitors secured multiple mortgages on properties stating that they had registered the title deeds to act as security on the loans. By the time the banks found out they had been lied to, the situation was dire and they had lost their money. Since then some banks have shown nervousness in accepting assurances from solicitors and are insisting that title deeds are submitted. This had put an additional pressure on solicitors’ working in this field as well as increasing the amount of time need to complete the conveyancing process. The legal profession has been trying to work hard to limit the damage caused by these two solicitors and have been recommending that solicitors be barred from practicing if they fail to register title deeds. These are all steps in the right direction, but for the time being the situation is looking bleak for conveyancing firms. However it is hoped that once the housing market starts to recover the legal profession will not be too far behind. <br /><br /><br />--<br />Danielle is an author of several articles pertaining to <a href="http://www.onlyfinance.com/Mortgages/" title="Mortgages">Mortgages</a>. He is known for his expertise on the subject and on other Business and Finance related articles. <br /><br><br>Source: <a href="http://www.articletrader.com/">http://www.articletrader.com</a> ]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
