ArticleTrader.com
  

 Main Menu

  Home
  Member Login
  Forum
  Submit Article
  Membership
  RSS Feeds
  Contact Us
  About

 Services

  Article Distribution
  Link Building

 Tools

  ArticleMS
  Directory Tracker

 Categories

  Automotive
  Business
  Computers
  Entertainment
  Finance
  Food
  Health
  Home and Family
  Internet
  Legal
  Science
  Self Improvement
  Shopping
  Society
  Sports
  Technology
  » Mobile Phones
  » Satellite Radio
  » VOIP
  Travel
  Writing

187 users online.



 
  » Category Sponsors
  Get Your Link Here - Limited Time Bargain at only $11/month!

Home » Technology » Voip » Comcast, Bandwidth Capping, and the Approaching War on VoIP.

nitzankon
Article written by nitzankon

View Full Profile
Get Html Code
PDF | Print View | Post to your Site

Comcast, Bandwidth Capping, and the Approaching War on VoIP.

Submitted by nitzankon
Fri, 7 Nov 2008

Make Money With Your Site!
Sell Links off your
site at ReverseLinks.
Buy Permenant Links
Get Permanent Text Links
for cheap.
Throttling and bandwidth capping are a hot topic amongst forums devoted to bandwidth and ISPs. Both ISP defenders and attackers get heated up and give justifications as to why capping and throttling is acceptable or unacceptable, and why it should be allowed or disallowed by regulators.

There are good reasons for both, however as a whole ISPs are blowing the "P2P is destroying the network" horn a bit too loud. The fact is that P2P is not eating up anything, on the contrary- it is just giving monopolized ISPs a good excuse to become traffic-cop and control what we can and cannot do with the connection we're paying them for. This will have grave consequences and haunt consumers for years to come, in my honest opinion.

One critical aspect which will be affected greatly in the not-so-far future is independent Voice over IP. Independent VoIP is competing against Comcast Digital Voice, Time Warner Digital Phone, and other such VoIP-over-Cable offerings which typically cost 3-4 times what independent VoIP providers charge, and almost as much as a regular phone would. In today's internet situation, consumers barely feel the difference between indy VoIP and cable-provided VoIP. It's pretty much all the same quality-wise.

Recently however, an alarming news came from Comcast when they circulated the following message among it's users:

"As part of our ongoing efforts to continuously improve the quality of our service, we are switching to a new network congestion management technique by the end of the year. It is focused on managing network congestion only when and where it may occur. It will also replace the current technique and will help ensure that all of our customers receive their fair share of network resources..."

Comcast's website go on to indicate that Comcast VoIP Service will NOT be affected by this "network management" technique. So far so good, right? Wrong. What happens if you're using an independent VoIP provider? you guessed right - it's your problem, not Comcast's! If you get flagged for throttling, not only will your internet connection slow to a halt, should you dare to use a competing independent VoIP provider, your phone will also be affected and range from terrible quality to completely unusable.

Now, what exactly is stopping Comcast from sniffing your traffic (a practice they've already mastered), and once they figure out you are running VoIP applications over your connection just flag you for throttling? sure, you're not using a lot of bandwidth, in your opinion - but then again Comcast neglected to indicate what "a lot" actually means. There's nothing stopping them from arbitrarily deciding that 180kbps usage (the amount of total bandwidth required for a typical two-way VoIP conversation) over more than two minutes is "excessive". You'll end up getting great quality calls for the first two minutes, followed by horrible quality for the rest of the call.

In essence, Comcast specifically, and other ISPs too, hold way too much power in their hands, and all signs show they intend to use it. The high speed internet industry is a monopoly in the US. Even if there is some minor competition it is typically between one cable provider and one DSL provider, which is not real competition as they BOTH will "shape" your traffic - which is just another word for "control what you can and can't do with the bandwidth you're paying for". Today it is P2P applications. Tomorrow it is your Voice over IP, Video over IP, and any other applications which compete with them.

And don't think you're safe if you don't use an independent VSP, either. Ever used Skype? how about video chat over MSN Messenger or Yahoo! Messenger? given the high bandwidth these applications need they are much more likely targets for ISPs to start with. Now let's continue.. online gaming? no online gaming here! takes too much bandwidth! And how about YouTube? surely YouTube would be alright... right? wrong again! YouTube too consumes far more bandwidth than VoIP and even some P2P applications - which makes it a prime target for the I-want-to-control-your-traffic power-hungry modern ISP.

I think I've said enough, surely you too - my dear reader - can see where this is going, and what type of difficulties businesses operating over the internet are going to have in years to come. For competition's sake and for the sake of a free market and a free internet - this needs to be stopped, and stopped fast by laws and regulations - and the sooner the better. America is turning into a third world nation when it comes to internet connectivity, and we all will suffer the consequences while Comcast's CEO buys another yacht and private plane while ensuring shareholders that the competition is gone!

I wish you all a very happy, uncapped experience with your ISP, VSP, and other applications!

--

 

Nitzan is the President of Future Nine Corp - a leading VoIP Phone Service Provider, who also specializes in Cheap Calling Cards driven by VoIP.


Source: ArticleTrader.com
Creative Commons License

Comments

No comments posted.

Add Comment

You do not have permission to comment. If you log in, you may be able to comment.

 Top Authors

 1 Stebee (3270)
 2 limalan88 (2920)
 3 alien82 (2756)
 4 kajuba (2508)
 5 sverdlow (1712)
 6 juliet (1691)
 7 jamiehanson (1690)
 8 MarkeD (1296)
 9 AnthonyF (1244)
 10 robertoms2003 (1210)
 11 articles (1205)
 12 artavia.seo (1148)
 13 spinxwebdesign (1112)
 14 gprather (1071)
 15 cj (1069)

 Distribution

Article Distribution

  
  Affiliate Program 2Checkout.com, Inc. is an authorized retailer of ArticleTrader.com

0.04s